DHA and ARA are components fortified to milk, resembling the fatty acid composition of natural breast milk. DHA are from fermented algae and ARA from fungus. There is a lot of conflict regarding these additives. There are questions whether these nutrients really provide the nutrition claimed by infant formula producers or if in fact they are dangerous for young infants. Some doctors claim that they are good while others are not.
Regarding the source of the supplements, it is preposterous to claim any form of precision. The fatty acid content in each supplement is not in general consumed by infants. With the knowledge of the synergistic mechanism behind nutrition, adding new fatty acids that are not usually present in a customary diet may create different nutritional consequences. Regardless whether negative or positive, I am quite sure though that there is plenty of research data from the formula producers hyping the advantages.
The developing human body is a complex progression but the effects of diet to the developing infant's physiology may be subtle or may not be. Nevertheless, the vast raw materials needed for the chemistry to be effective and efficient to propagate life is already found in nature and this is proven by evolution.
However, modern technology allowed use to mimic natural items. This is really a double-edged sword. Scientific study has shown potentially harmful side effects of these additives. On the flip side, some studies reported no side effects.
The FDA already approved the use of these supplements. They recommend that formula producers engage in research in order to study long term exposure benefits or risks. But who wants to participate in ongoing research regarding a questionable diet product especially involving their child?
The awareness in the consumer market of the unknown variables inherent in the use of DHA and ARA is paramount. Education of the consumer may be difficult though. Science is now being blurred by personal conflict to bigger profits.
Regarding the source of the supplements, it is preposterous to claim any form of precision. The fatty acid content in each supplement is not in general consumed by infants. With the knowledge of the synergistic mechanism behind nutrition, adding new fatty acids that are not usually present in a customary diet may create different nutritional consequences. Regardless whether negative or positive, I am quite sure though that there is plenty of research data from the formula producers hyping the advantages.
The developing human body is a complex progression but the effects of diet to the developing infant's physiology may be subtle or may not be. Nevertheless, the vast raw materials needed for the chemistry to be effective and efficient to propagate life is already found in nature and this is proven by evolution.
However, modern technology allowed use to mimic natural items. This is really a double-edged sword. Scientific study has shown potentially harmful side effects of these additives. On the flip side, some studies reported no side effects.
The FDA already approved the use of these supplements. They recommend that formula producers engage in research in order to study long term exposure benefits or risks. But who wants to participate in ongoing research regarding a questionable diet product especially involving their child?
The awareness in the consumer market of the unknown variables inherent in the use of DHA and ARA is paramount. Education of the consumer may be difficult though. Science is now being blurred by personal conflict to bigger profits.
About the Author:
To find the best Infant formula for your child's needs, check out this website: www.best-infantformula.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment